Cheat Sheet: How I Screen a Delta-Neutral Position
My step-by-step screening process before opening any delta-neutral position. From scanner filters to final volume check.
How I Screen a Delta-Neutral Position
Before opening any position, I run through the same process every time. No shortcuts, no gut feelings. Here's the exact workflow.
Quick Checklist
- Target APR defined (mine: 12%+)
- Leverage set (mine: x2)
- Funding 30D looks solid
- Cost 24H ≤ 0.5%
- Positive rate ≥ 80%
- Candidates favorited
- 7D funding trend: stable or rising
- Entry spread (1H → 24H → 7D): bot-friendly
- Exit spread: not aberrant
- Daily volume ≥ 3x position size on both DEXs
- Price trend matches funding direction
Step 1 — Set Your Target
My target: 12%+ APR minimum.
Not exciting, not greedy. That's the floor. Anything below doesn't justify the capital locked up and the monitoring effort. Define yours before you start filtering — it keeps you disciplined.
New to delta-neutral? Read What Is Delta-Neutral Trading? first.
Step 2 — Choose Your Leverage
My leverage: x2.
Why? Because it lets me match my total equity with my position size. With $10K deposited on each DEX, I open a $20K position on each side. My balance covers the position exactly — clean and simple.
Could I go higher? Sure. But higher leverage brings my stops closer. At x2, I can set my stop-loss around 40% price movement — that's wide, the market can breathe without knocking me out. At x3, my stops drop to around 25%. At x4, we're at ~20% — one volatile day is enough to trigger a stop and force me to close a position that was profitable. The higher the leverage, the tighter the stops, the more I need to watch.
| Leverage | $10K Balance per DEX | Position per Side | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|
| x2 | $10,000 | $20,000 | Relaxed — once or twice a day |
| x3 | $10,000 | $30,000 | Active — check multiple times a day |
| x4+ | $10,000 | $40,000+ | Stressful — constant vigilance needed |
Higher leverage amplifies returns, but also amplifies the need to watch your position. For a strategy that's supposed to be low-maintenance, x2 is the sweet spot.
To understand how stops work in practice, see Protecting Your Position: SL/TP Configuration.
Step 3 — Filter in the Scanner
Three filters, applied in order:
Funding Rate
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Period | 30 Days |
| Slider | Don't touch it |
30D shows structural yield, not noise. If it doesn't look good over a month, a 1-day spike won't save it.
Cost (Spread)
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Period | 24 Hours |
| Maximum | 0.5% |
Why 0.5%? Simple math. At 12% APR, you earn roughly 0.033% per day. To recover a 0.5% entry cost, you need ~15 days just to break even. That's the maximum I'm willing to accept. Lower is always better.
Break-even formula: Cost % / (APR % / 365) = days to recover
Positive Rate
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum | 80% |
If funding was negative more than 20% of the time, the pair is too unreliable. 80% is my floor — I prefer 85%+.
For a deeper dive on funding mechanics, see How Funding Rates Work. For a full walkthrough of the Scanner, see the Scanner Guide.
Step 4 — Shortlist
Everything that passes all three filters gets favorited. These are my candidates. Usually 3-8 pairs survive.
Step 5 — Simulate Each Candidate
Now I go one by one. Click through to the Simulator and check four things:
4a. Funding Trend (7D)
Switch to the 7-day funding chart.
- Is the trend stable or improving? Good.
- Is it declining sharply? Pass.
- Did it flip negative recently? Pass.
The 7D trend tells you where funding is going, not just where it's been.
4b. Entry Spread
Check the spread chart across three windows, in order:
| Window | What it tells you |
|---|---|
| 1 Hour | Current snapshot — is entry cheap right now? |
| 24 Hours | Daily pattern — does spread compress at certain times? |
| 7 Days | Structural behavior — can the bot consistently find good entries? |
The goal: confirm that the bot has room to catch advantageous entry spreads over time, not just in this moment. For more on how spread impacts your yield, see Understanding Spread.
4c. Exit Spread
Same principle as entry. Check 1H, 24H, 7D.
Red flag: If exit spread is consistently 3-5x higher than entry spread, that's a trap. You'll get in cheap and pay through the nose to get out.
4d. Volume Check
Rule: your position size x3 = minimum daily volume required, on EACH platform.
| Position Size | Min. Daily Volume per DEX |
|---|---|
| $5,000 | $15,000 |
| $10,000 | $30,000 |
| $20,000 | $60,000 |
| $50,000 | $150,000 |
Low daily volume = slippage on entry, slippage on exit, and potential difficulty closing in a hurry. Non-negotiable.
Go / No-Go
| Check | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 30D APR | 12%+ |
| Leverage | x2 (balance = position) |
| 24H Cost | 0.5% max |
| Positive % | 80%+ |
| 7D Funding trend | Stable or rising |
| Entry spread (7D) | Tight, bot-friendly |
| Exit spread | Not aberrant |
| Volume | 3x position size, both sides |
All green → Open the position. See the step-by-step guide if it's your first time. Any red → Pass. Move to the next candidate.
Bonus — Quick Technical Analysis Check
Stable funding doesn't appear out of nowhere. It's usually tied to a stable price trend — up or down, doesn't matter. What matters is that the market has conviction in one direction.
Before I commit, I pull up the price chart for the asset and ask one question: does the trend match the funding?
- Strong uptrend + consistently positive funding → Longs are paying shorts. The trend is sustaining the funding. Makes sense — green light.
- Strong downtrend + consistently negative funding → Shorts are paying longs. Also makes sense — just make sure you're positioned on the right side.
- Choppy, sideways price + stable funding → Worth investigating. Funding can stay directional in ranges, but it's less reliable. Proceed with caution.
- Trend reversal starting + funding still high → Danger zone. If the price trend that was sustaining the funding flips, funding will follow — often fast. This is where positions go from profitable to underwater.
I don't do deep technical analysis. No indicators, no patterns. Just: zoom out, look at the trend over the same period as your funding filter (30D), and check that the two tell a coherent story. If the chart and the funding agree, the setup is solid. If they disagree, something is about to change — and you don't want to find out what while holding a position.
This is my personal screening process — not financial advice. Adapt the thresholds to your own risk tolerance and capital. For a full overview of the risks involved, read The Risks of Delta-Neutral Trading.